What does “finalizing” a file truly imply?

What does “finalizing” a file truly imply?

  1. Will we signal the file therefore it turns out to be kind of encoded?
  2. Can there be like an item of plain book that people sign and pass they by, as an example, a zip, and allow the obtaining area monitors that part according to a certain protocol prior to going further?
  3. Or something like that else?

In so far as I is able to see, if we signal the complete file, then it could be more secure since materials might be encoded (or signed). But I’ve furthermore seen/heard a few examples in for which you only sign an article of book as opposed to the entire thing.

5 Answers 5

Unfortuitously, the responses here which report that signing is the same as encoding of information digest aren’t completely appropriate. Signing doesn’t require encrypting a digest on the information. While it’s appropriate that a cryptographic process is actually applied on a digest of the information created by a cryptographic hash algorithm and not the content it self, the work of signing are unique from encoding.

From inside the conceptual realm of books, RSA signing and RSA electronic thing. From inside the real life of implementations, they are not. Thus don’t ever utilize a real-world utilization of RSA decryption to compute RSA signatures. When you look at the most useful circumstances, your implementation will get down a way which you determine. In worst instance, you certainly will introduce a vulnerability that an assailant could exploit.

In addition, you shouldn’t make the mistake of generalizing from RSA to close out that any encoding design is generally modified as a digital signature algorithm. That kind of version works well with RSA and El Gamal, not overall.

Producing an electronic signature for a message entails working the message through a hash purpose, promoting a digest (a fixed-size representation) for your information. (more…)

Continue ReadingWhat does “finalizing” a file truly imply?